Our
investment philosophy is to purchase stocks in the same way that a
knowledgeable buyer would evaluate a business for acquisition in its
entirety. The business should be simple
to understand, utilize conservative accounting methods, and should be led by
individuals whose interests are aligned with shareholders, are ethical and
competent leaders, and are able to articulate a sound growth strategy and value
proposition.
After a company passes our rigorous quantitative screens, we will conduct thorough due diligence process, which focuses on four core evaluations that we believe are critical drivers of long term stock out-performance. These are: competitive positioning, earnings quality, management integrity, and valuation or "margin of safety"
Step 1. Evaluation: Competitive Positioning
•We
look for companies that have built competitive advantages that are difficult to
replicate and who possess bargaining power relative customers and suppliers,
have the ability to control pricing of their products or services, which, over
the long run allows them to higher returns on their invested capital.
•We
also place considerable emphasis on business risks such as the threat of new
entrants, the risk of substitute products or services, and the breadth or
concentration of its customer base. earn higher returns on invested capital.
Competitive Advantages
•Patents &
Intellectual Property (Microsoft, Pfizer)
•Network “Multiplier”
Effect (eBay, Cisco)
•Economies of Scale –
Low cost producers (Honda/Toyota)
•Distribution Network
(PepsiCo)
•High “startup” costs
– Limiting entrants
Competitive Risks
•Concentrated customer
base (auto-part suppliers)
•Concentration of
supplier base (Intel/AMD)
•Threat of new
entrants
•Substitutes (music
industry)
Step 2. Evaluation: Earnings Quality
•We
also place particular
emphasis on earnings quality, evaluating not just a company’s margin trends,
but its ability grow revenues faster than it must reinvest or acquire new
assets, such as property, plant, equipment.
•We
demand that each
company we own generates free cash flow and is able to support the growth of
its business internally, rather than having to seek dilutive financing through
the capital markets. Additionally, we have found that historically, deteriorating cash flow trends coinciding with strong earnings trends, often signals either operational challenges (i.e. bloated inventories of products that can't be sold, or sharp increases in accounts receivable that allows customers to make purchases on credit as a way to drive sales growth) or even, more scrupulously, accounting manipulation. We avoid these "earnings torpedo's" by analyzing both earnings and free cash flow trends.
•Our
best ideas are
typically those stocks that are growing free cash flows at faster rate than
reported income, as we have found this fundamental characteristic is highly
correlated with market outperformance.
Step 3. Evaluation: Margin of Safety
| Most importantly ,however is the margin of safety that we require for purchasing stocks. We are value investors, which means that we invest in companies that we believe trade at a substantial discount to what we consider to be their true business, or intrinsic value. We are patient investors, not market timers. We believe that, over time, the price of a stock will rise to reflect the value of the underlying company. |
Valuation Points: Value vs. Momentum? | While some proponents of momentum investing will disagree, we believe that the historic performance of value investing provides conclusive evidence that, all else equal, buying stocks during periods of low valuations and selling at peak valuations will generate superior results over the long term. |
Valuation Points: Our Methodology |
Demand 25% discount to intrinsic value
Discounted Cash Flow & Scenario Sensitivity: Using conservative assumptions, what is the businesses "intrinsic" value
Private Market Value - Comparable M&A Transactions: What are industry "players" and private equity companies willing to pay for a similar company?
Sum of the Parts & Asset Plays: Are the assets, including cash, equipment, land worth more than the value of the stock?
Multiple Analysis: See Below
|
| Importantly, we spend considerable time understanding the appropriate valuation metrics that drive value in a particular industry. For example, looking at price to earnings estimates for an industrial company with enormous levels of depreciation, or a financial company whose earnings may be highly impacted by market volatility, may be inappropriate gauges of the companies true worth. |
Valuation Points: Industry Specific Metrics
| Industrials |
Financials |
Technology |
Health/Consumer
|
Energy/Materials
|
Telecom/Util. |
Hotels/REITS |
Price to Cash Flow
EV/EBITDA |
Price/Book
"Tier 1 Ratio" |
Price/Growth
Price/Sales |
Price/Earnings
Price/Cash Flow |
Price/Reserves
Price/Cash Flow |
Price/Subscriber
EV/EBITDA |
Price/Room
Comparable Sales |
|
|